Showing posts with label writing advice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label writing advice. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

Outlining & Spreadsheets for Novels (Or, Ways to Stop Your Writer's Brain from Imploding)

Currently Listening: "Lead Me Home"- Jamie N Commons (The Walking Dead OST Vol. 1)

For those who don't know: Since 2007, I have been co-writing Three of Swords, a Victorian fantasy novel series, with my sister Melissa, who is an artist and does all the covers and illustrations for the books. You can take a look at it here--new site will be going up next week though, so check back to see the update. As of this post we have released online the first four volumes and are currently in the midst of writing the fifth.

I confess--this post is a bit of a cheat. I'm writing it because of all the questions I've gotten when I post screenshots of when I'm starting a new chapter in my latest novel and am using our beloved spreadsheet. It's hard to explain it briefly and comprehensively, so I decided to explain it it all here with pictures and such and allow people to comment. I will answer questions in either edits or later posts (I mean to blog more about writing!). But to be honest, the original idea was inspired by the writing process of YA fantasy author Justine Larbalestier who blogs a lot of really genius stuff about writing that I recommend giving a look-see. Like all writing advice, some of her ideas may work for you and some won't (she's a different human being than you--and Aussie after all ;) ), but it's been useful to me. You can adapt suggestions and make them your own, like I (and my sister/co-writer, Melissa) have done with the novel spreadsheet. Justine's original post on the spreadsheet was from her post "How to Write A Novel", which is a fantastic summary of novel-writing advice. She published this in 2006 and I likely first read it around then, but didn't utilize it till 2007, when we first started writing Three of Swords.

I would love at some point to write a post about how we came up with Three of Swords (3ofS) using a game I made up, but that's for another time (if you want to hear about it, let me know!). Suffice to say, before 3ofS I'd never finished anything in the 10+ years I'd been writing and was troubled with a lot of writer's block in my other stories, so focusing on a massive project like 3ofS was a bit new for me. Melissa had finished a few books with a friend before as a kid, but nothing that compared to the complexity that 3ofS was--and unlike the books she'd done, 3ofS required co-operation on a very intense level--alternating first-person narrators (and writers) chapter-by-chapter while still keeping the overarching story flowing and consistent. My days of writing-by-the-seat-of-my-pants were over and we had to establish official agreement on plot structure or else nothing would hold together.

But before we get down into it:

SITTING DOWN AND LOVINGLY ORGANIZING EACH CHAPTER OF THE NEXT GREAT AMERICAN NOVEL IS NOT A REPLACEMENT FOR WRITING. THE BEAUTY OF BEGINNING A NEW STORY IS HOW FREE AND OPEN IT IS. TRY WRITING FREESTYLE FIRST (ESPECIALLY IF YOU HAVE SCANT WRITING EXPERIENCE) AND LET THE STORY TAKE YOU WHERE IT WANTS TO GO. THINK ABOUT THE STORY ALL THE TIME, TOY WITH IDEAS, FILL IT WITH THINGS YOU LOVE. THEN TURN TO A SPREADSHEET TO GUIDE THE MASS OF THOUGHTS CLUTTERING YOUR BRAIN.

Note: This method can work with standalone novels, as well as lengthy series. I believe it could easily be adapted to graphic novels also, and may help with that kind of plotting by chapters/issues, though you would also need to outline panels.


How It Begins: Nothing as Neat as a Spreadsheet

3ofS is thirteen volumes long and each volume has no less than thirteen chapters usually. We alternate narrators partly because of convenience (it gives us each a break) but also because it keeps the story interesting for readers and shows both Lucien and Tom (or the secondary narrators, Anabelle and Helene) equally. There have been exceptions to this rule at times when the story needs to be told in such a way that we have to stick with a character two chapters in a row, but more on that later. Here is a sample of what the 3ofS spreadsheet looks like (showing Vol. 1-3):

Spoilers if you haven't read the first three volumes.
The annotations should've explained this, but CC stands for Chapter Contents. That row goes off-screen here, but it's not usually terribly specific, just enough to help us both remember what happens there. This is important prior to writing of course, but even afterwards because it's easy to forget what happened where when you're going through older chapters for fact-checks.

As I said before, I got the idea from Justine Larbalestier. She does it all a bit differently. This is a screenshot she posted of the spreadsheet she made for her novel Magic or Madness:

I don't really know what all the red numbers are for either, so don't ask.





























Justine's explanation and further suggestions: 
"At a glance I can see which pov was telling what chapter, what day it was, where they were, and who was getting the lion share of the novel. You can also have a content column that lets you know whether it’s a sitting-around-talking chapter (“) or a sitting-around-and-thinking (‘) or an action-packed chapter (!) or somewhere in between (^) or one with sex (*).If your content column (cc) looks like this

!

!

!

!

!

!

!
then you might decide that after all that running/shooting/jumping/giving birth, it may be time for a wee spot of (“) or (‘) or (*) or (@), so as not to exhaust your reader. Mix ‘em up. See what happens."
I prefer to be more specific in my own CC, but I do think basic annotations like Justine's can help, especially if your novel is more of a drama (like hers) than an action-adventure (like 3ofS), and you need a reminder to vary the mood.

Spreads with Benefits

When imagining your story, your brain may take delight in that beginning scene that sets the stage for the whole plot--your hero falls out of the saloon and into the water trough (because bar-fights are sexy in fiction), or you are one of those writers who like to begin at the end and you begin with the girl about to die in, I dunno, a ballet studio at the hands of a crazed vampire or whatever. Then you skip along through some other fun bits, the action, the romance, the comedy, the tragedy, and then OH YEAH the end, where you kill everyone and your heroine stands on the hill covered in blood. It's a pretty sweet story. But how exactly she got from the beginning where she fished our soaked and sexy hero out of the water trough doubtless has some big ol' holes. Not plotholes necessarily, but just ughhh-that's-a-pain-to-think-about-so-let's-move-on-to-a-fun-thought-holes. Gaps, blanks, sections where your characters get from Point A to Point B somehow.

The spreadsheet forces you to think about those tough things, or at least construct some kind of thought as a placeholder while you figure it out. Sometimes you're simply filling in blanks--e.g. Tom is doing this, next time we see Tom, time should've passed, so filler chapter of Lucien. Don't fuss too much over the CC. Put what you know and what makes some small amount of sense, even if it's not explicit.

Serious spoilers blurred out, but 3ofS readers might enjoy the preview nonetheless. As I said, Melissa and I are only now in the midst of Vol. V (the screenshot below is actually up-to-date), and I'm about halfway done with Chapter 6, so haven't put in the page numbers or title yet. Most unwritten chapters don't have titles--Vol. VI, Ch. 13 is an exception.
You can see that some of the CC are more general: "Tom talks [to *****]"or extremely practical: "Arrival; Meeting Emile". Others only make sense to us the writers--your spreadsheet isn't a script or a lesson plan. It's not the kind of thing you can hand off to someone else to do the actual work (unless they have a lot of creative wiggle room). "Helene goes to the bathroom" is shorthand for what occurs and reading that I am reminded of what important stuff actually occurs. Much of it is also completely facetious or ironic--the CC that reads "The Most Important Part in [the Series]" is an inside joke and we know what it entails.

Timing is also pretty important, no matter how long a stretch of time your story takes. If your story takes place in 24 hours, you can plan out the hour slot in the "Date" column. As you can see further above, Justine Larbalestier's novel takes place in a week's span, so she put each day of the week. 3ofS's 13 volumes begin in September 1888 and end (SPOILER??) in December 1889, so that's a lot more time to plan, but it does allow for some flexibility of dates. Since we have a fixed historical time period, we use the calendar on TimeandDate.com to find out what days of the week certain dates, holidays, and phases of the moon fell on.

If your story takes place over years, I highly recommend also making a timeline spreadsheet--whole other topic, but I'm giving out all the secret workings of my own story planning, so might as well.

View from the top of the timeline--you may notice it starts at 1800, 80 years before the story begins. Don't mind how crazy we are...it also ends at 1921.
Not sure if the column titles are legible, but they are: YEAR, BORN, DEATHS, EVENTS, ENGAGEMENTS & MARRIAGE (some singular/plural and verb/noun inconsistency there--sorry.) This has been a huge help in knowing when things in the past happened (and what happens in the future... ;) ). Might do a post on timelines and character profiles someday if there's as much interest in characterization as there has been in plotting. So I'll leave that for now.

As I said in the Disclaimer above, I don't recommend starting a spreadsheet when you haven't written a word. Melissa and I didn't start the spreadsheet till some time after Chapters 5-6 when the two main protagonists meet and we had this storyline growing in our heads. The spreadsheet is to fence all that in and organize it in rows. For every other volume we never started writing till we had outlined it on the spreadsheet--it helps to know what's ahead and not to waste time. At the moment we have no more than the first two chapters of Vol. X outlined, as seen below:

FYI: The POVs & locations of Vol. X are not official beyond Chapter 2--they were copy-pasted from the previous volume. The timing for Vol XI: The Devil is actually relatively official; also jsyk that is my favorite volume title.
We're thinking pretty far ahead, as you can see....and hopefully we can finish outlining Vol. X this summer; it'd be great to have the whole series outlined by the end of the year. This might seem a bit of a scary thing to do--planning so very far ahead--if we're at Vol. V, what if things change, of the story starts going in another direction, or we discover some legit plotholes (it took far shorter a time to sail to NY from the UK in 1888 than I thought apparently), or some other plotting disaster befalls us?

The Flexibility of the Spreadsheet

It's important to remember that this is an edit-enabled document you're making, not this:
It's also hopefully a bit more organized. [Source]
The backspace key is there for a reason, as are options like inserting or deleting rows. The spreadsheet should be flexible. I'm not going to get too much into mental processes of story planning here (because it's too different for people), but your mental plan should be flexible also. Sometimes things need to be changed because they don't fit. When Melissa and I first started the 3ofS spreadsheet, we had a lot of crap ideas. Not gonna lie. As you write, you come to a better understanding of the characters themselves and of what kind of story you're telling.

Some future plans are completely out-of-character. In Volume II, in the chapter where the beautiful Duchess of Everington seduces Lucien, she and Lucien originally had sex (spoiler: what actually happens is she gives him a sleeping potion while they're making out, because as far as the Duchess is concerned: sex? ain't nobody got time fo' that.). Pretty early on we realized that the Duchess wouldn't and didn't need to waste time, so we cut that. I've been accused of talking about fictional characters like they're real people, but it's sometimes the best way to understand them--you're going to get to know them better the more you think and write about them. You'll learn things about their childhood and realize that what you thought they would do in that pivotal scene, they would actually never do. So don't be afraid to change your outline.

Some events are pointless in the larger scheme of things and will make you miserable to write. 3ofS Volume V (seen above) originally featured a crazy magician named Mr. Mortini and his hot Russian ballerina assistant as a main conflict for Lucien's narratives. As we thought more about Vol. V, we hated that plot point more and more. So we cut it and gave Lucien a new and better conflict, that actually addresses some of his past and will play into the future. Also, remember how I said that sometimes the CC can be a filler chapter so you can keep on putting in the important stuff? Later on, a CC that says a character simply goes to the store may be pretty stupid, since it will only result in a two-page scene of the character picking up groceries and clipping coupons. Re-plan and think of something better when you get closer to it, combine it with another chapter, or just cut it. That's how we ended up with two Anabelle chapters in a row in Vol. IV. The Helene chapter was pointless to read or write.

I would be shocked if you never had to change sections of your outline. If a story is going well then it should be complex enough to have evolved and require some adjustments.

In Conclusion: That's All I Got for Now, Folks.

That's basically the key to how we plan a novel series without going entirely out of our minds. Now you know the truth.
Just replace that machine with my Macbook.

As always, questions much encouraged.

Monday, June 28, 2010

A Post About Being Productive--Which I Am Not.

I'm not terribly good at being productive. Today I had this whole plan that I would wake up early (summertime early, not normal-time early) at 9:00 instead of when my body naturally awakes (10:00), but my sister woke me up at 8:45 or something saying, "I thought you were getting up early!!" "I am..." I said sadly, "in a few minutes, when my ALARM goes off." She apologized, and I decided to hit the snooze until 9:30...which is still better than 10, right? Nevertheless, I took a long shower, got into a fight, got dressed, compared my GED scores to my brother's, made some iced coffee from Starbucks new presweetened Iced VIA Coffee, read a James Patterson book, and pretty much did nothing. However, my younger sister did try to tempt me with pleas to watch more of Season 2 of BBC's "Merlin" on YouTube....but I resisted, which is incredible.

I am supposed to be working on this piece that mainly takes place in a Viennese cafe (it's during the Victorian era, so it's pre-Hitler...it's during the age of the Austro-Hungarian empire fyi), and it has these six people (three couples) and they're eating lunch and being cute and rude and horrid and all. But I have to maintain this funny light attitude while writing and I've been wayy too moody for it. I listen to Florence & the Machine's "Heavy" and can't be all cute and funny! Humor has never been easy easy for me to write (except sarcasm)....But I do this too everything I write really. I come up with excuses as to why I can't finish it. I hit that 7-page mark and I get stuck. Or, if I get past the 7-page hurdle, it's the 12-page spot that gets me. So it's really me, and maybe that I don't push myself enough? But I have co-finished two novels...so that's something? It's helpful (though annoying) to have a co-writer pushing you. 'Cause pushing yourself is hard. You can want to finish a novel and reach that goal all you want, but it's 'drive' that's the toughest to get a hold of.

I remember when I took the GED in '08, the essay was on "Ambition" or something. That was before I learned how to write a good essay in college, so it was probably terribly written. Basically though, it was about how it's 'drive' that moves ambition. I told a story about how someone had told me that, or said something to me about ambition--and I don't even remember what this story was, though I do remember who the person was. It was someone I thought was interesting, until I got to know them better and they turned out to be sort of boring. What I remember most from the essay was some terrible metaphor about how ambition without drive is like a car without wheels? Or something. (I did say it was terribly written.) But the idea is sort of basically true. You can WANT to finish a story all you like, but if you don't have that drive that moves you toward that goal, that ambitious goal is worthless. (It should be noted that I just took a break from writing this blog to skim through my dash on Tumblr.) I have drive, but it's in small quantities and comes and goes and sometimes I think I run full out and need a refill.

I think drive is fueled by inspiration (SORRY MY METAPHORS SUCK). I don't hold by the muse idea, but inspiration is important. I personally get my inspiration from music, movies, TV, books, people, food, or whatever, but for some people (my sister) books dry out inspiration. I remember sitting through movies in the theater and trying to pay attention to the movie WHILE working out an idea (note: this multi-tasking is only right when watching crap movies like Hulk [the Eric Bana one] or X-Men 3). Melvin Burgess' "Blood Tide" novel changed my LIFE and I think, the way I develop stories. His story was SICK, both literally and figuratively. It was genius (though I don't recommend it at all, because it is nauseatingly violent), and the characters were such twisted people--and it had a huge impact on me as a young teen. Anyway, I often excuse my time-wasting by telling myself I'm gathering inspiration, which is bad, but actually kind of true. So closing the Word doc and going out for ice cream can be inspiration. You never know what you'll see or do that will inspire you!

So to conclude...it seems as if I have an idea of AMBITION being a car that will take you to your GOAL, and DRIVE is the wheels, and INSPIRATION is the fuel. That is super-lame-sounding. Sorry!~ But that's the basic idea. You need all four to do anything.

And I did end up being productive...I wrote a page in my Three of Swords chapter, which took a surprisingly dark turn. So that legitimized my desire to watch Merlin 2x02... Not since Harry Potter have I been this crazy about shipping (relationships for the non-fandom-savvy). In the days of the HP books, I was violent about Harry/Ginny and Ron/Hermione...and I totally was for Snape/Lily, Lupin/Tonks, Neville/Luna, Fred/Angelina, and other stuff that did happen or didn't happen. I even did admit that Ginny/Draco would be cool if Harry/Ginny wasn't such an OTP (one true pairing). But Merlin brings out the old rusty fangirl in me, and I have my ships and will stand by them. Like with HP though, I am annoyed by the SO OBVIOUSLY non-canonical shipping. Dude. Harry/Hermione was stupid. Sirius/Remus was just silly. And nurgghhhh Merlin/Arthur WILL NEVER HAPPEN, so get over it, people. And that was my random geek prattle for the day. Will now go to Tumblr where it's okay to do this.

Oh and by the way, John Farnham's "You're the Voice" is THE OFFICIAL SONG OF FOREVER.

Tuesday, June 1, 2010

Bad Mythology and Tolerance, but not Tolerance of Bad Mythology


All I ask out of books in general is that they fit loosely in the broad genre of “good”. By good, I don’t mean a morality tale, where all the sinners get gored on horns of bulls or anything necessarily—I mean sometimes there are moral people who deserve a good goring (i.e. Elsie Dinsmore). Good doesn’t have to mean you feel smarter after having read it, like it’s Dostoevsky or C.S. Lewis. Good could mean Meg Cabot, which leaves me giddy and loving life—and 10x more likely to jump for joy, hit a chair, and tumble soundly onto my face (true story). Good isn’t even necessarily extraordinarily well-written—not everyone’s Neil Gaiman or Orson Scott Card, where every sentence is amazingly crafted constructions of genius. Heavens, no. I wouldn’t even WANT every author to be like that…I’d feel more than a little inadequate then. I don’t think Stephenie Meyer is an extraordinary writer. As much as I enjoy her stories, I do sometimes find sentences I’m not fond of, and in general her writing is hardly mind-blowing. But she entertains, she is consistent with her own mythology, obviously took time to work on her mythology and writing, and cares about her story.

I feel like I could head into a treatise on The Art of Writing, but I won’t and by this paragraph break am stopping myself. Good writing can be anything from Gaiman to Austen to Cabot to Card to Tolstoy to Rowling to Dickens to Meyer to Lewis to Tezuka (a somewhat biased list, except that I’m not a particularly huge Dickens fan and Gaiman is so good that when he’s bad he’s hellishly bad). My standards are not wildly high. Not at all. But there are things I will not abide, and they are so easily avoidable, I don’t understand why some people fall into them so eagerly.

Remember what I said about Meyer’s mythology? Sure, it’s out there and quite weird. But it’s consistent with itself. You may not like it, but it is. It’s believable in context. Once I suspend my disbelief in vampires, I can accept that these vampires have a bloodlust stronger than carnal lust. From there, I will accept that vampires do not want people to know of their existence, so they prey secretly. Okay, and some groups chose (on various grounds) to resist temptation and only drink the blood of animals, which is less tasty and satisfying. I also accept that a socially weird human girl might admire these vampires and want to be like them. They’re noble in abstaining from the things they desire. Meyer’s mythology plays into the way people really are at times, and the kinds of things people find admirable. It moves slowly, and it wasn’t until the later books that the “world” of vampires comes into play—by the last book it was a majorly complicated mythology, but it wasn’t confusing because it came piece by piece.

But some people don’t get that. They dump the mythology in chunks in the beginning, then figure that the reader gets it now and shove along with the plot. Disaster occurs.

“Tantalize” by Cynthia Leitich Smith

This book first came out in early 2007, which must have been the time I first came upon it in a public library. I always fall for pretty cover art and titles—more-so than synopses sadly—and the pretty redhead paired with a sexy title was a win for me. That and vampires, being that I’d been into vampires since eighth grade (pre-Twilight AND Underworld and without reading Ann Rice). I have only the vaguest memories of the plot. All I recall is a girl, her bff who was a boy and a werewolf or something, and someone being murdered after only a few pages. I remember turning back several times, looking for explanations for scenes that didn’t make sense, and being too disinterested and confused to plow through dull writing.

Apparently this book is about a girl named Quincie Morris (ugh) who is an orphan and lives with her uncle—together Quincie and Uncle Davidson (UGH) remodel the family restaurant and rename it Sanguini’s, then because they needed a gimmick to make up for some indequacy I assume, they give the place a “vampire theme”. Remember, it’s called SANGUINI’S. If you don’t see the stupid logic, just move on and be happy. The vampire theme is not gross or weird though, because, and I quote from an Amazon review quoting from the novel, “vampires are a fringe population, and Austin [in Texas] is a tolerant place.” Ok first of all, let’s accept this premise as difficult as it may be to do so. Vampires exist. People tolerate that. Got it. So they make a vampire-themed restaurant? What? This is like making a “black person”-themed restaurant because you live in a town with a decent black population and people are tolerant. What does vampire-themed mean? Not like Mexican-themed, where you eat tacos, hang sombreros, and listen to Spanish music? Do they drink blood, wear fangs, and listen to Evanescence? Or is it more of a general theme, with horrible dish titles that I don’t feel corny enough to imagine? (Feel free to suggest a few of your own.)

Moving on—the chef of Sanguini’s is murdered. My initial guess is an offended vampire, who maybe should’ve lynched Uncle Davidson or Quincie instead for CONCIEVING this idea. But NO. The manner of death implies that a WEREWOLF did it. Oh no and guess what? Quincie’s bff, Kieren, is a “hybrid werewolf who traces his lupine heritage to the wolves that roamed Ireland with St. Patrick.” The police look with suspicion upon Kieren’s noble heritage, which makes Quincie sad because she has a crush on Kieren. But Quincie and Uncle D move on from that, hiring a new chef named…Henry Johnson. Yes. Henry Johnson. Not Edin or Aidan or Jace or something COOL. His laast name isn’t even cool, like Kieren’s (which is Morales). His name isn’t totally random like Uncle Davidson’s. I’m going to just ASSUME he is really a VAMPIRE and that is why his name is Henry, because so many vampires are named Henry, and he’s maybe immortal so he’s old, and has a classic name (like Edward). But Henry is WEIRD. One reviewer describes him as “spooky, with red contact lenses, pale hair, and a menu featuring sweetbreads, blood sausage and baby squirrels in honey cream sauce,” while another sums him up as “quirky.” Well if that’s quirky, please don’t even tell me what’s plain old weird.

That about sums up the premise, but apparently there are conflicts, like Kieren’s choice to leave Austin and join up with a pack of werewolves, a lá Call of the Wild. This also makes Quincie sad I presume, and probably makes the police even more suspicious (understandably). BUT Quincie is distracted by Henry, who “prods Quincie into drinking wine, skipping school, and discovering her sensuality.” I don’t know which is funnier, wine-drinking as the height of naughty-ness or the fact that a teenager needs someone to tell them about their sensual side. Apparently there are more murders and everyone acts crazy and Quincie fears for her life. One Amazon reviewer closes with this bit: “Quincie's story hews closer to the campy Buffy the Vampire Slayer episodes (e.g., " 'You ate the police?!' I exclaimed") than to the elegant romanticism of Stephenie Meyer's books, but horror fans will be hooked by Kieren's quiet, hirsute hunkiness, and Texans by the premise that nearly everybody in their capitol is a shapeshifter.

Kieren probably looks a little bit like this.

BUT THIS BOOK WAS DULL. And the Amazon customer reviews call it a “pile of bile” and a waste of time and money. None of the reviewer’s give complete spoilers, but I hear evil wins out. (Also people alternate between calling Henry “Brad/Bradley,” so I’m REALLY confused.) I think I get why I couldn’t bear this book and blocked most of it. One reviewer says it felt like the book was missing pages—which was exactly how I felt. You can’t just dump the premise HEY VAMPIRES ARE NORMAL and roll with it. A lot of books try that--dumping a complicated premise on the reader and then forcing onward with their plot. The book I’m reading now, “Fairy Godmother” by Mercedes Lackey does the same thing. Original mythologies are beautiful things, but if handled wrong, they are HORRIBLE. They have to be believable! I don’t believe for one second that if vampires existed, they’d be “tolerated” like they were of a different skin color. If they are tolerated, you have to explain that. Start WITH that. Don’t assume because you say it is so in your novel, readers will believe you. THEY WON’T. In the real world, people don’t tolerate different skin color so easily. It wasn’t easy for the U.S to reach the place it is now, and acting like blood-drinking cold immortals would be accepted enough to have restaurants based on them like they’re a cute joke is just too ridiculous.

I'm not really sure what this means, but it looks like it belongs in this post.